Thursday, January 6, 2011

Floyd Mayweather, Jr. Sued (Again) By Nevada Community Association

It seems the legal drama continues to grow for Floyd Mayweather, Jr.

On January 4, 2011, The Estates at Southern Highlands Golf Club Community Association ("Association") filed a complaint against Floyd Mayweather, Jr. ("Mayweather") in Clark County District Court for (among other things) allegedly "physically accosting" a security guard and "threatening the life of a patrol officer." 

According to the allegations in the complaint, Mayweather resides at a property within the Association "and, as such, is subject to and governed by the restrictive covenants contained within that certain Supplemental Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions and Reservation of Easements for the Estates at Southern Highlands Golf Club (the "Declaration"), recorded in the Clark County Recorder's Office on July 11, 2000, in Book No. 20000711, as Instrument No. 01727."

Plaintiff alleges that Mayweather has "engaged in, and continues to engage in, conduct which has resulted in several violations of the use restrictions as set forth in the Declaration, and the Association's Rules and Regulations."

Specifically, plaintiff alleges as follows:
Since October 2010, Defendant has repeatedly engaged in hostile, harassing and threatening behavior towards and against certain employees and security personnel employed by the Association and the Community, including but not limited to, threatening the life of a patrol officer, physically accosting a security officer, refusing to provide identity to gate officers, refusing to obtain a transponder to gain access to the Association, refusing to place identification decals upon his vehicles, physically entering the Gate House to gain access to the Association, entering the Association through the exit gate and seeking entrance to the main gate with commercial vehicles. 
Plaintiff asserts claims for "Violation of Restrictive Covenant" and "Declaratory Judgment" and asks in its prayer for relief, inter alia:
3.  For an injunction ordering Defendant to display his identification to security to gain access to the Association;
4. For an injunction ordering Defendant to remain inside of the vehicle at the gate at all times when seeking accessing the Association; and

5. For an injunction ordering Defendant to refrain from threatening, yelling, or harassing security, and will otherwise comport himself at all times in a reasonable manner.
Fight Lawyer